Skip to main content

Real-Time Talk: Windows 10 IoT Core Background Tasks and ASP.NET Core Web Apps

Display useful information from your Windows 10 IoT Core application in an ASP.NET Core web app, essential for integrating IoT data into a solution.

Windows 10 IoT background task talk with a web application using WebSockets.

Problems

As my path to this solution has been troublesome, I am listing here the main problems I faced so my dear readers have a better idea of dead-end streets along the way:
  • I was not able to make the ASP.NET Core web application run under a Windows 10 IoT background service.
  • I found no information about when or if it will be supported in the near future.
  • ASP.NET MVC and ASP.NET Core have different SignalR implementations.
  • I was not able to make a SignalR client for .NET Core work with SignalR hosted on a web application.
I was able to make things work by directly using a WebSocket. It’s not as nice a solution as I had in my mind, but it works until things get better.

Making the Background Task and Web Application Talk


I worked out simple and not-very-well polished solution to make a Windows 10 IoT Core background task communicate with an ASP.NET Core web application hosted on a Raspberry Pi. I implemented two types of communication on the same WebSocket endpoint. The following image illustrates what is supported.
Windows 10 IoT Core background task and ASP.NET Core web application
To make my sample more informative, I also implemented some primitive functionalities to demonstrate how data moves.


  1. The Windows 10 IoT Core background task reports random numbers to the web application every 10 seconds.
  2. The web application has a simple console to send commands to the Windows 10 IoT Core background task. Supported commands are:
    1. opsys: returns operating system information from the background task
    2. machine name: returns the machine name where the background task runs
Here is a fragment of the web application's front page when the background service runs.
WebSocket sample output with command

    Comments

    Popular posts from this blog

    Common Sense Identification of the Security Problems

    Organizations make key information security mistakes, which leads to inefficient and ineffective control environment. High profile data breaches and cyber-attacks drive the industry to look for more comprehensive protection measures since many organizations feel that their capability to withstand persistent targeted attacks is minimal. But at the same time, these organizations make some key information security mistakes, that jeopardize their efforts towards control robustness. Although many firms invest in security technologies and people, no one has the confidence that the measures taken are good enough to protect their data from compromises. Below are the 10 worst mistakes which are common to find, and important to address in the path of mature information security posture. If you analyze the cyber security scenarios, and organizational capabilities, the prevailing trend is a vendor-driven approach. In many cases, security professionals adopt the attitude of procuring...

    Rethinking the way we build on the cloud: Layering the Cloud

    To help, you can split your cloud architecture into three layers: Visible Volatile Persistant Visible This is the layer between the cloud and the rest of the world. It is mainly public DNS entries, load balancers, VPN connections etc. etc. These things are fairly static and consistent. If you have a website you will want the same A Name records pointing at your static IP. Things in the visible layer rarely change or if they do they are for very deliberate reasons. Volatile This is where the majority of your servers are. It’s called volatile because it tends to change a lot. The known state (how many servers, what versions of which software they run etc.) are changing frequently, perhaps even several times per hour. Even in a traditional data centre your servers are being upgraded, having security patches applied, new versions of software deployed, extra servers added etc. On the cloud this is even more volatile when you use patterns such as the Phoenix server and m...