Skip to main content

Design of Large-Scale Services on Cloud Services PART 1

Cloud computing is distributed computing; distributing computing requires thoughtful planning and delivery – regardless of the platform choice. The purpose of this document is to provide thoughtful guidance based on real-world customer scenarios for building scalable applications

Fail-safe noun. Something designed to work or function automatically to prevent breakdown of a mechanism, system, or the like.
Individuals - whether in the context of employee, citizen, or consumer – demand instant access to application, compute and data services. The number of people connected and the devices they use to connect to these services are ever growing. In this world of always-on services, the systems that support them must be designed to be both available and resilient.
The Fail-Safe initiative  is intended to deliver general guidance for building resilient cloud architectures, guidance for implementing those architectures  and recipes for implementing these architectures for specific scenarios. 

This article focuses on the architectural considerations for designing scalable and resilient systems.


  • Decompose the Application by Workload: Defining how a workload-centric approach provides better controls over costs, more flexibility in choosing technologies best suited to the workload, and enables a more finely tuned approach to availability and resiliency.
  • Establish a Lifecycle Model: Establishing an application lifecycle model helps define the expected behavior of an application in production and will provide requirements and insight for the overall architecture.
  • Establish an Availability Model and Plan: The availability model identifies the level of availability that is expected for your workload. It is critical as it will inform many of the decisions you’ll make when establishing your service.
  • Identify Failure Points and Failure Modes: To create a resilient architecture, it’s important to understand and identify failure points and modes. Specifically, making a proactive effort to understand and document what can cause an outage will establish an outline that can be used in analysis and planning.
  • Resiliency Patterns and Considerations: This section represents the majority of the document, and contains key considerations across compute, storage, and platform services. These considerations focus on proven practices to deliver a healthy application at key considerations across compute, storage, and platform services.
  • Design for Operations: In a world that expects services to be “always on”, it’s important that services be designed for operations. This section looks at proven practices for designing for operations that span the lifecycle, including establishing a health model to implementing telemetry to visualizing that telemetry information for the operations and developer audiences.
We will discuss in detail on the bullet point in the coming article.....keep watching

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Python and Parquet Performance

In Pandas, PyArrow, fastparquet, AWS Data Wrangler, PySpark and Dask. This post outlines how to use all common Python libraries to read and write Parquet format while taking advantage of  columnar storage ,  columnar compression  and  data partitioning . Used together, these three optimizations can dramatically accelerate I/O for your Python applications compared to CSV, JSON, HDF or other row-based formats. Parquet makes applications possible that are simply impossible using a text format like JSON or CSV. Introduction I have recently gotten more familiar with how to work with  Parquet  datasets across the six major tools used to read and write from Parquet in the Python ecosystem:  Pandas ,  PyArrow ,  fastparquet ,  AWS Data Wrangler ,  PySpark  and  Dask . My work of late in algorithmic trading involves switching between these tools a lot and as I said I often mix up the APIs. I use Pandas and PyArrow for in-RAM comput...

Real-Time Talk: Windows 10 IoT Core Background Tasks and ASP.NET Core Web Apps

Display useful information from your Windows 10 IoT Core application in an ASP.NET Core web app, essential for integrating IoT data into a solution. Windows 10 IoT background task talk with a web application using WebSockets. Problems As my path to this solution has been troublesome, I am listing here the main problems I faced so my dear readers have a better idea of dead-end streets along the way: I was not able to make the ASP.NET Core web application run under a Windows 10 IoT background service. I found no information about when or if it will be supported in the near future. ASP.NET MVC and ASP.NET Core have different SignalR implementations. I was not able to make a SignalR client for .NET Core work with SignalR hosted on a web application. I was able to make things work by directly using a WebSocket. It’s not as nice a solution as I had in my mind, but it works until things get better. Making the Background Task and Web Application Talk I worked out sim...

DANGER (STILL) LURKS IN THE INTERNET OF THINGS (IOT)

All of the media, both “mainstream” and “tech”, has gushed over all of the new appliances and devices that are now in the category of what we would call the Internet of Things.  Items like home security,  home lighting, and refrigerators, to name a few. There are many advantages to having connected appliances and devices, Threats that can and will be exploited if unsuspecting users don’t secure them.   Two “layers” of security : The first layer of offering  is a security API that will provide [a way] to easily do a virtual patch, to prevent a remote attack, for example . . . the third layer is cloud: IoT cannot do anything without the cloud.  Most data is sent to the cloud and you will need to have proper protection and make sure the cloud is always available. In both situation Users are vulnerable, mostly due to their own apathy.  Users often either don’t know how to patch their own machines (and in this case, devices) or have glanced...