Skip to main content

Design of Large-Scale Services on Cloud Services PART 1

Cloud computing is distributed computing; distributing computing requires thoughtful planning and delivery – regardless of the platform choice. The purpose of this document is to provide thoughtful guidance based on real-world customer scenarios for building scalable applications

Fail-safe noun. Something designed to work or function automatically to prevent breakdown of a mechanism, system, or the like.
Individuals - whether in the context of employee, citizen, or consumer – demand instant access to application, compute and data services. The number of people connected and the devices they use to connect to these services are ever growing. In this world of always-on services, the systems that support them must be designed to be both available and resilient.
The Fail-Safe initiative  is intended to deliver general guidance for building resilient cloud architectures, guidance for implementing those architectures  and recipes for implementing these architectures for specific scenarios. 

This article focuses on the architectural considerations for designing scalable and resilient systems.


  • Decompose the Application by Workload: Defining how a workload-centric approach provides better controls over costs, more flexibility in choosing technologies best suited to the workload, and enables a more finely tuned approach to availability and resiliency.
  • Establish a Lifecycle Model: Establishing an application lifecycle model helps define the expected behavior of an application in production and will provide requirements and insight for the overall architecture.
  • Establish an Availability Model and Plan: The availability model identifies the level of availability that is expected for your workload. It is critical as it will inform many of the decisions you’ll make when establishing your service.
  • Identify Failure Points and Failure Modes: To create a resilient architecture, it’s important to understand and identify failure points and modes. Specifically, making a proactive effort to understand and document what can cause an outage will establish an outline that can be used in analysis and planning.
  • Resiliency Patterns and Considerations: This section represents the majority of the document, and contains key considerations across compute, storage, and platform services. These considerations focus on proven practices to deliver a healthy application at key considerations across compute, storage, and platform services.
  • Design for Operations: In a world that expects services to be “always on”, it’s important that services be designed for operations. This section looks at proven practices for designing for operations that span the lifecycle, including establishing a health model to implementing telemetry to visualizing that telemetry information for the operations and developer audiences.
We will discuss in detail on the bullet point in the coming article.....keep watching

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Python and Parquet Performance

In Pandas, PyArrow, fastparquet, AWS Data Wrangler, PySpark and Dask. This post outlines how to use all common Python libraries to read and write Parquet format while taking advantage of  columnar storage ,  columnar compression  and  data partitioning . Used together, these three optimizations can dramatically accelerate I/O for your Python applications compared to CSV, JSON, HDF or other row-based formats. Parquet makes applications possible that are simply impossible using a text format like JSON or CSV. Introduction I have recently gotten more familiar with how to work with  Parquet  datasets across the six major tools used to read and write from Parquet in the Python ecosystem:  Pandas ,  PyArrow ,  fastparquet ,  AWS Data Wrangler ,  PySpark  and  Dask . My work of late in algorithmic trading involves switching between these tools a lot and as I said I often mix up the APIs. I use Pandas and PyArrow for in-RAM comput...

How to construct a File System that lives in Shared Memory.

Shared Memory File System Goals 1. MOUNTED IN SHARED MEMORY The result is a very fast, real time file system. We use Shared Memory so that the file system is public and not private. 2. PERSISTS TO DISK When the file system is unmounted, what happens to it? We need to be able to save the file system so that a system reboot does not destroy it. A great way to achieve this is to save the file system to disk. 3. EXTENSIBLE IN PLACE We want to be able to grow the file system in place. 4. SUPPORTS CONCURRENCY We want multiple users to be able to access the file system at the same time. In fact, we want multiple users to be able to access the same file at the same time. With the goals now in mind we can now talk about the major design issues: FAT File System & Design Issues The  FAT File System  has been around for quite some time. Basically it provides a pretty good file structure. But I have two problems with it: 1. FAT IS NOT EXTENSIBLE IN PLAC...

Common Sense Identification of the Security Problems

Organizations make key information security mistakes, which leads to inefficient and ineffective control environment. High profile data breaches and cyber-attacks drive the industry to look for more comprehensive protection measures since many organizations feel that their capability to withstand persistent targeted attacks is minimal. But at the same time, these organizations make some key information security mistakes, that jeopardize their efforts towards control robustness. Although many firms invest in security technologies and people, no one has the confidence that the measures taken are good enough to protect their data from compromises. Below are the 10 worst mistakes which are common to find, and important to address in the path of mature information security posture. If you analyze the cyber security scenarios, and organizational capabilities, the prevailing trend is a vendor-driven approach. In many cases, security professionals adopt the attitude of procuring...