A Review of Processing Push-down Part 5:

I want to be sure that I’ve conveyed the concepts behind these criteria properly… I may have rushed it in the early parts of this series.
Let’s imagine a query that joins a 2,000,000 row table with a 1000 row dimension table where both live in HDFS.
If all of the data has to be moved from HDFS to the RDBMS then 2,001,000 rows must be read and moved in order to apply a predicate or any other processing.. For fun lets say that the cost of moving this data is 2001K.
If there are 10 parallel pipes then the data movement is completed in one tenth the time… so the cost is 200K.
If a predicate is included that selects only 5% of the data from the big table, and the predicate is pushed down the cost is reduced to 101K. Add in parallel pipes and the cost is 10K
Imagine a query where there is a join between the two tables with predicates on one side and predicate push down… then you have to pay 101K to pull the projected data up and do the join in the RDBMS. If there is a join predicate that reduces the final answer set by another 95% then after the join you return 6K rows. Since everybody returns the same 6K rows as an answer we won’t add that in.
But if you can push the join down as well as the predicates then only 6K rows are moved up… so you can see how 2001K shrinks to 6K through the effective push down of processing.
Further, you can build arbitrarily complex queries and model them pretty well knowing that most of the cost is in data movement.
So think about how Teradata processes these two tables in Hadoop when you use the specialized SQL constructs and then again if you build the query from a BI tool. And stay tuned as I’ll show you how HANA processes the data next…. and then talk about several others.

Comments

Common Sense Identification of the Security Problems

Organizations make key information security mistakes, which leads to inefficient and ineffective control environment. High profile data breaches and cyber-attacks drive the industry to look for more comprehensive protection measures since many organizations feel that their capability to withstand persistent targeted attacks is minimal. But at the same time, these organizations make some key information security mistakes, that jeopardize their efforts towards control robustness. Although many firms invest in security technologies and people, no one has the confidence that the measures taken are good enough to protect their data from compromises. Below are the 10 worst mistakes which are common to find, and important to address in the path of mature information security posture. If you analyze the cyber security scenarios, and organizational capabilities, the prevailing trend is a vendor-driven approach. In many cases, security professionals adopt the attitude of procuring...

Real-Time Talk: Windows 10 IoT Core Background Tasks and ASP.NET Core Web Apps

Display useful information from your Windows 10 IoT Core application in an ASP.NET Core web app, essential for integrating IoT data into a solution. Windows 10 IoT background task talk with a web application using WebSockets. Problems As my path to this solution has been troublesome, I am listing here the main problems I faced so my dear readers have a better idea of dead-end streets along the way: I was not able to make the ASP.NET Core web application run under a Windows 10 IoT background service. I found no information about when or if it will be supported in the near future. ASP.NET MVC and ASP.NET Core have different SignalR implementations. I was not able to make a SignalR client for .NET Core work with SignalR hosted on a web application. I was able to make things work by directly using a WebSocket. It’s not as nice a solution as I had in my mind, but it works until things get better. Making the Background Task and Web Application Talk I worked out sim...

Python and Parquet Performance

In Pandas, PyArrow, fastparquet, AWS Data Wrangler, PySpark and Dask. This post outlines how to use all common Python libraries to read and write Parquet format while taking advantage of columnar storage , columnar compression and data partitioning . Used together, these three optimizations can dramatically accelerate I/O for your Python applications compared to CSV, JSON, HDF or other row-based formats. Parquet makes applications possible that are simply impossible using a text format like JSON or CSV. Introduction I have recently gotten more familiar with how to work with Parquet datasets across the six major tools used to read and write from Parquet in the Python ecosystem: Pandas , PyArrow , fastparquet , AWS Data Wrangler , PySpark and Dask . My work of late in algorithmic trading involves switching between these tools a lot and as I said I often mix up the APIs. I use Pandas and PyArrow for in-RAM comput...

Big Data and Cloud Computing

Search This Blog